<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for Google Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/</link>
	<description>Semi-Developed Thoughts on Authentic Learning with Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:05:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: i pick on layne</title>
		<link>http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>i pick on layne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>[...] I can&#8217;t belive this! They have blocked google video. Why? Through all my years I have been looking at videos on google video and have not seen anything outrageous! why? people have been looking at this all the time and dont see anything bad.Why ? How bout we just block bad videos instead of the whole system. ? ???. lets sit down and think a bit rather than blocking an enormouse rescourse to the learning commmunity. lets just block about the hundred videos that are on google video that are dirty instead of killing our minds. Lets get a new internet security thing. Ours right now Is not the best to use. This sentance is a link to mr wilkoffs blog where it better proves my point.       No Comments so far      Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;del datetime=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can&#8217;t belive this! They have blocked google video. Why? Through all my years I have been looking at videos on google video and have not seen anything outrageous! why? people have been looking at this all the time and dont see anything bad.Why ? How bout we just block bad videos instead of the whole system. ? ???. lets sit down and think a bit rather than blocking an enormouse rescourse to the learning commmunity. lets just block about the hundred videos that are on google video that are dirty instead of killing our minds. Lets get a new internet security thing. Ours right now Is not the best to use. This sentance is a link to mr wilkoffs blog where it better proves my point.       No Comments so far      Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;del datetime=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer is the bomb! It&#8217;s way better than baseball&#8230;no matter what you think! &#187; Google Video Banning</title>
		<link>http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer is the bomb! It&#8217;s way better than baseball&#8230;no matter what you think! &#187; Google Video Banning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>[...] I would like to go off of Mr. Wilkoff&#8217;s post, The Case for Google Video.  He stated that is outrageous for 8e6 to completely ban this website from school.  It provides a type of learning for the student body.  He has argued that we see the crap on Google Video on commercials anyway, even if it&#8217;s not appropriate, but I truly think that the commercials have worse things on it because adults look on them more.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would like to go off of Mr. Wilkoff&#8217;s post, The Case for Google Video.  He stated that is outrageous for 8e6 to completely ban this website from school.  It provides a type of learning for the student body.  He has argued that we see the crap on Google Video on commercials anyway, even if it&#8217;s not appropriate, but I truly think that the commercials have worse things on it because adults look on them more.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magenta Mascara &#187; Google Video</title>
		<link>http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Magenta Mascara &#187; Google Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>[...] We have to crank a blog out every week. It was easy at first, but I ended up writing an entire post about the little hook on the top of the iBooks, no joke. We end up needing resources so that we don&#8217;t lose every single reader, or poison them with these blogs. They&#8217;re dangerous things, really. Describing pictures got old, really old. First and foremost, your readers can see them, and don&#8217;t need your commentary unless they are partially or completely blind, which means they can&#8217;t read you blog anyway, so don&#8217;t bother. We experimented with building comments, which was interesting, but ended up with many responses such as &#8216;thanks for the recognition, but you completely missed the entire point of the post, but thanks anyway,&#8217; and &#8216;what the heck is a building comment and why do they have one on my post?&#8217; which was slightly strange to see references all over the post from an anonymous blog&#8230;hmmm. Then there was poetry, which was commentable because you could interpret it, much unlike a cartoon or pic. Posts with google video typically delve much deeper into the mind/concept. They are interpretable, much like poetry, but you can also question the content, design elements, choice of video, sounds and any metaphors that might be linked to the writing.  To rob us of google video is to prevent a rising technologic age that many are enthused about, but that the world is too afraid to allow.  This sacred age is too huge to prevent, and the resistance will only make it bigger, more industrial.  Embrace this changing age, and allow Google Video. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have to crank a blog out every week. It was easy at first, but I ended up writing an entire post about the little hook on the top of the iBooks, no joke. We end up needing resources so that we don&#8217;t lose every single reader, or poison them with these blogs. They&#8217;re dangerous things, really. Describing pictures got old, really old. First and foremost, your readers can see them, and don&#8217;t need your commentary unless they are partially or completely blind, which means they can&#8217;t read you blog anyway, so don&#8217;t bother. We experimented with building comments, which was interesting, but ended up with many responses such as &#8216;thanks for the recognition, but you completely missed the entire point of the post, but thanks anyway,&#8217; and &#8216;what the heck is a building comment and why do they have one on my post?&#8217; which was slightly strange to see references all over the post from an anonymous blog&#8230;hmmm. Then there was poetry, which was commentable because you could interpret it, much unlike a cartoon or pic. Posts with google video typically delve much deeper into the mind/concept. They are interpretable, much like poetry, but you can also question the content, design elements, choice of video, sounds and any metaphors that might be linked to the writing.  To rob us of google video is to prevent a rising technologic age that many are enthused about, but that the world is too afraid to allow.  This sacred age is too huge to prevent, and the resistance will only make it bigger, more industrial.  Embrace this changing age, and allow Google Video. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Lesson Plans &#187; 02.20.07</title>
		<link>http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Lesson Plans &#187; 02.20.07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/02/20/the-case-for-google-video/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the Google Video Challenge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the Google Video Challenge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
